Gut. 2010 May;59(5):572-8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a levofloxacin-based regimen as the first-line treatment and a clarithromycin-based regimen as the second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the eradication rates of these two regimens using different administration sequences. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomised to receive LAL: levofloxacin (750 mg once a day), amoxicillin (1000 mg twice a day) and lansoprazole (30 mg twice a day) for 7 days, or CAL: clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day), amoxicillin (1000 mg twice a day) and lansoprazole (30 mg twice a day) for 7 days. Patients with positive [(13)C]urea breath test after treatment were retreated with the rescue regimen in a crossover manner for 10 days. RESULT: When used as first-line treatment (n=432), the eradication rates of LAL (n=217) and CAL (n=215) were 74.2 and 83.7% (p=0.015) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 80.1 and 87.4% (p=0.046) in the per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. When used as second-line treatment, the eradication rates of LAL (n=26) and CAL (n=40) were 76.9 and 60% (p=0.154) in the ITT analysis, and 80 and 61.5% (p=0.120) in the PP analysis, respectively. The overall eradication rates of CAL followed by LAL were better than the reverse sequence in both the ITT analysis (93% vs 85.3%, p=0.01) and the PP analysis (97.6% vs 92.5%, p=0.019). The eradication rate was significantly lower in the presence of levofloxacin resistance in the LAL group (50% vs 84.4%, p=0.018) and clarithromycin resistance in the CAL group (44.4% vs 90.7%, p=0.002). CONCLUSION: CAL achieved a higher eradication rate than LAL as the first-line treatment, but not as the second-line treatment. The strategy of using CAL as the initial treatment and LAL as the rescue regimen achieved higher eradication rates than the reverse sequence.
paper saying LAL based therapy is little bit superior
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Jan 12;90(2):79-82.
[Levofloxacin-based triple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: a multi-central, randomized, controlled clinical study]
[Article in Chinese]
Cheng H, et al
Department of Gastroenterology, First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and tolerability of 7-day standard triple therapy versus 7-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy in first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. METHODS: Three hundred consecutive H.pylori positive patients were randomized to receive: clarithromycin, amoxicillin, lansoprazole (Group A: n = 150); or amoxicillin, levofloxacin, lansoprazole (Group B: n = 150). H. pylori status was rechecked by (13)C-urea breath test 4 weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rates in intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were: Group A, 74.5% (111/149) and 78.2% (111/142); and Group B, 82.4% (122/148) and 83.0%(122/147). Although the eradication rate achieved with levofloxacin-based triple therapy was higher than that with standard therapies in either ITT or PP analysis, but no significantly difference was found between the two triple therapies. The incidence of side effects was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: A 7-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy can achieve higher H.pylori eradication rate than standard regimen. The levofloxacin-based regimen can be one effective therapy for the first-line anti-H.pylori treatment.
